Our Call to Action re: Canmore Area Trails Master Plan

We’ve come to understand that unmanaged human recreation on trails is as harmful as development when it comes to how wildlife use – or don’t use – this valley. Over two thirds of trails in the Bow Valley are ‘undesignated’ or unsanctioned, with more of these ‘pirate trails’ being built every year. The Canmore Area Trails Master Plan (CATMP) is our best hope to turn this around, creating a superior trail network while protecting valuable ecosystems and an important and internationally-renowned wildlife corridor.

We have achieved much in Canmore that is worth celebrating: four decades of work to protect wildlife corridors and bear-proof garbage containers so no more bears die because they’re in our garbage! Next up: a better plan for trails.

Our Call to Action

Before the Government’s 21 January 2026 deadline:

  • Read the Canmore Area Trails Master Plan plan. The good news is that if you wish to comment on this as a whole - you only have to read 12 pages! (pp 3-15).

  • Fill out the government’s survey, following our survey response suggestions.

  • Add your comments to the interactive map of your favorite trails.  These comments are an important input for the government.

  • Consider writing to the honorable Todd Loewen, Minister of Forestry and Parks - feel free to borrow some elements from our own letter to the Minister (pending).

  • Attend our information session on this topic: Wednesday 14 January 2026, 7-9 pm, Canmore Senior’s Centre.

  • Please scroll down to read our comments about the Master Plan and the scientific basis for our work.

Photo credit: John E. Marriott

How we feel about the Canmore Area Trails Master Plan

  • We believe that, properly done, the draft Canmore Area Trails Master Plan is our best chance to improve future prospects for wildlife, and support the local economy - but we’re not there yet.

  • It is absolutely critical that we get this Plan right - otherwise we risk cutting off the last remaining wildlife corridor connecting Banff National Park and Kananaskis Country.  Science tells us we've already LOST 85% of the wildlife connectivity we used to have in this area - WE ARE AT A TIPPING POINT.

  • Any successful trails master plan must contain three E’s: Engineering, Education, and Enforcement. Although the Engineering component is good, Education and Enforcement is missing from this document.

  • Specifically: the Plan’s trail design principles contain many pro-environment features, including trail-free areas, seasonal closures, trail bundling, community loops, and decommissioning 232 km of unauthorized trails - while at the same time designating 537 km of trails, including 232 km of new designated trails, some in higher elevation terrain that is less valuable for most wildlife.

  • These features create the potential for a better trail system AND better outcomes for wildlife, including habitat improvement and less restricted wildlife movement – but ONLY if the Plan is improved by including key management features:

    • How to inform and educate trail users about the wildlife that share this area: how to stay safe on trails, and how to respect wildlife habitat and corridors.

    • How enforcement will be implemented.

    • Monitoring of human and wildlife use of the area - and how findings will be used to adapt how the area is managed.

    • How the trail system will be governed in the long term.

  • Unless this important content is added - and implemented -  human use of the proposed trail network will not be well managed – and the Plan will fail.

  • The Final Terms of Reference for this initiative (basically, what should be in the master plan) details what the scope of the Master Plan should be (pp. 8-10) yet the master plan itself contains only a fraction of that information. The government should have followed its very own terms of reference.  Both these documents can be found on the government's landing page for this entire initiative.

  • We believe that trail users want to do the right thing – but as it stands now, trail users won't know if they're on an unauthorized trail or an official (sanctioned) trail, won't know if they're in or close to a wildlife corridor, and won't learn some common sense guidelines (dogs on leash, making noise on the trail, etc) that keeps them and wildlife safe.

  • We support the Plan’s Desired Conditions (pages 6-7), that describe desired ecological conditions, visitor experience, and trail governance (including adaptive management and monitoring) - but the plan contains nothing that shows how these desired conditions will be met.

  • Despite the name, this initiative covers a large and ecologically important area, from Banff’s east park gate to Seebe (map).

The scientific basis for our work

Related Media

Photo credit: Government of Alberta

Note the timestamp on each image. Photo credit: Government of Alberta