The Canmore Area Trails Master Plan has the potential to make this valley better for trail users – AND for wildlife! But we’re not there yet… 

Thanks to everyone who attended our Panel Discussion and Information session on Jan.14! The evening was a big success with over 200 people in attendance, plus another 36 via Zoom. We have had several requests to share the presenter’s slides from the session so here they are at the following link:

VIEW THE JAN.14 PRESENTER'S SLIDES

Our Call to Action re: Canmore Area Trails Master Plan

Photo credit: John E. Marriott

We’ve come to understand that unmanaged human recreation on trails is as harmful as development when it comes to how wildlife use – or don’t use – this valley. Over two thirds of trails in the Bow Valley are ‘undesignated’ or unsanctioned, with more of these ‘pirate trails’ being built every year. The Canmore Area Trails Master Plan (CATMP) is our best hope to turn this around, creating a superior trail network while protecting valuable ecosystems and an important and internationally-renowned wildlife corridor.

We have achieved much in Canmore that is worth celebrating: four decades of work to protect wildlife corridors, and bear-proof garbage containers so no more bears die because they’re in our garbage! Next up: a better plan for trails.

So - here’s our call to action. Before the Government’s 21 January 2026 deadline:

How we feel about the Canmore Area Trails Master Plan

We believe that, properly done, the draft Canmore Area Trails Master Plan is our best chance to improve future prospects for wildlife, and support the local economy - but we’re not there yet.

Photo credit: Government of Alberta

It is absolutely critical that we get this Plan right - otherwise we risk cutting off the last remaining wildlife corridor connecting Banff National Park and Kananaskis Country. Science tells us we've already LOST 85% of the wildlife connectivity we used to have in this area - WE ARE AT A TIPPING POINT.

  • Any successful trails master plan must contain three E’s: Engineering, Education, and Enforcement. Although the Engineering component is good, Education and Enforcement is missing from this document.

  • Specifically: the Plan’s trail design principles contain many pro-environment features, including trail-free areas, seasonal closures, trail bundling, community loops, and decommissioning 275 km of unauthorized trails - while at the same time designating 537 km of trails, including 232 km of new designated trails, some in higher elevation terrain that is less valuable for most wildlife.

  • (Use the following points in your note to the Minister): The Plan creates the potential for a better trail system and user experience, AND better outcomes for wildlife, including habitat improvement and less restricted wildlife movement – but ONLY if the Plan is improved by including key management features:

    • Informing and educating trail users about how to avoid conflicts between users (e.g. hikers and mountain bikers), helping them know where they are so they don’t get lost, how to stay safe in wildlife habitat, and to stay on authorized trails to respect the wildlife that use wildlife corridors.

    • How enforcement will be implemented.

    • Monitoring of human and wildlife use of the area - and how findings will be used to adapt how the area is managed.

    • How the trail system will be governed in the long term: how responsibility and authority will be shared between the province, municipalities, and landowners.

  • Unless this important content is added and then implemented, human use of the proposed trail network will not be well managed – and the Plan will fail.

  • The Final Terms of Reference for this initiative (basically, what should be in the master plan) details what the scope of the Master Plan should be (pp. 8-10) yet the master plan itself contains only a fraction of that information. The government should have followed its very own terms of reference. Both these documents can be found on the government's landing page for this entire initiative.

  • We believe that trail users want to do the right thing – but as it stands now, trail users won't know if they're on an unauthorized trail or an official (sanctioned) trail, won't know if they're in or close to a wildlife corridor, and won't learn some common sense guidelines (dogs on leash, making noise on the trail, etc) that keeps them and wildlife safe.

  • We support the Plan’s Desired Conditions (pages 6-7), that describe desired ecological conditions, visitor experience, and trail governance (including adaptive management and monitoring) - but the plan contains nothing that shows how these desired conditions will be met.

  • Despite the name, this initiative covers a large and ecologically important area, from Banff’s east park gate to Seebe (map).

Note the timestamp on each image. Photo credit: Government of Alberta

The scientific basis for our work

Science shows us that how, where, and when we recreate directly affects whether bears, wolves, and other animals can safely move through the valley. The good news? We already know how to meet the needs of wildlife while still providing great outdoor experiences for people. Small changes in how we design and use trails can make a big difference.

Click here to view the Fast Facts on Trail Impacts Guide!
 
 

Related Media

Our Relevant Videos

Thanks to Tracey Henderson and Gareth Thomson for their thoughts on how this plan holds real promise of offering a better deal for both trail users and wildlife if it’s implemented properly. That means not just trail design, but the human management pieces that belong in any strong master plan: education, enforcement, and proper management.

This Trails Master Plan has real potential, if it’s paired with education & enforcement. Thanks to Laura Quelch and Canmore & Area Mountain Bike Association for championing a future where people and wildlife all belong.